"In Europa ci sono già i presupposti per l'esplosione di un conflitto sociale. Questo è il seme del malcontento, dell'egoismo e della disperazione che la classe politica e la classe dirigente hanno sparso. Questo è terreno fertile per la xenofobia, la violenza, il terrorismo interno, il successo del populismo e dell'estremismo politico."

lunedì 11 novembre 2024

È disponibile - a partire dalle 20:30 di stasera - il video della conferenza/dibattito "Dalla crisi greca alla crisi della Germania" svoltasi a Pisa lo scorso sabato 9 novembre 2024:




Modera il dibattito Pietro Bargagli Stoffi - ricercatore EPFL, autore della distopia sul tramonto della democrazia in EU "Uropia, il protocollo Maynards" - con Fabio Dragoni, opinionista televisivo e de "La Verità", autore del saggio "Per non morire al verde".


Interventi di Mario Peccatori, Presidente dell'associazione "Madreterra Nostra" organizzatrice dell'evento, e di Ludovico Vicino, segretario nazionale di "Pro Italia".


Il dibattito ha seguito la proiezione del documentario "Il più grande successo dell'Euro" (il documentario lo si trova qui: https://vimeo.com/122331366).


Si ringraziano la Gipsoteca di San Paolo all'Orto per la disponibilità della sala, i giovani di "Pro Italia" per le realizzazioni audio e video, Vittorio Banti, sceneggiatore del documentario proiettato. 

venerdì 8 novembre 2024

Conferenza a Pisa "Dalla crisi greca alla crisi della Germania", sabato 9 novembre ore 15:30


Vi aspetto domani alle 15: 30 a Pisa, con Fabio Dragoni,
alla Gipsoteca di Piazza San Paolo all'Orto



 

venerdì 3 maggio 2024

GUERRA AL PENSIERO - Trasmissione del 29 aprile 2024

Questo è il video integrale della trasmissione "GUERRA AL PENSIERO" andata in onda sul canale YouTube di #libertàdipensieroMDN il 29 aprile 2024.

Ospiti: Martina Pastorelli, Giuseppe Liturri, Marco Montanari e Filippo Burla.

GUERRA AL PENSIERO


Pochi giorni dopo la messa in onda di questa trasmissione, l'intero canale #libertàdipensieroMDN è stato cancellato da YouTube per motivi non specificati.

lunedì 22 aprile 2024

A VOLTE RITORNANO - Trasmissione del 22 aprile 2024

Video integrale della trasmissione "A VOLTE RITORNANO" sul canale #libertàdipensieroMDN.

Ospiti: Fabio Dragoni, Giuseppe Liturri, Sergio Giraldo.

A VOLTE RITORNANO 

martedì 27 giugno 2023

Spyware in Europa: UE autorizza sorveglianza intrusiva dei giornalisti?

Draft EU plans to allow spying on journalists are dangerous, warn critics

Move to allow spyware to be placed on reporters’ phones would have a ‘chilling effect’, say media experts

Draft legislation published by EU leaders that would allow national security agencies to spy on journalists has been condemned by media and civic society groups as dangerous and described by a leading MEP as “incomprehensible”.
On Wednesday, the European Council – which represents the governments of EU member states – published a draft of the European Media Freedom Act that would allow spyware to be placed on journalists’ phones if a national government thought it necessary.

Unusually, the council did not take the step of holding an in-person meeting of ministers responsible for media before the draft was published.
The Dutch MEP Sophie in’t Veld, who has overseen the European parliament’s investigation into the use of Pegasus spyware on journalists and public figures, said the claim that permission to spy on the press was needed in the interests of national security was “a lie”. “I think what the council is doing is unacceptable. It’s also incomprehensible. Well, it’s incomprehensible if they are serious about democracy,” said In ‘t Veld.
The first draft of the act – originally tabled by the European Commission to strengthen protections for the independence of journalism in countries where it is under threat such as Poland and Hungary - had included strong safeguards against the use of spyware. The draft must be agreed by the European parliament before it becomes law.

The European Federation of Journalists (EFJ), which represents more than 300,000 members of the press in 45 countries including the UK, accused EU leaders of holding the principles of media freedom in “dangerous disregard”. The EFJ said the move was a “blow to media freedom” that would “put journalists even more at risk” than they are already. Giving governments the power to place spyware on journalists’ phones on the grounds of “national security” would have a “chilling effect on whistleblowers” and other sources, it warned. “We know too well how the defence of national security is misused to justify media freedom violations,” it added in a statement calling for the European parliament to “save” the draft legislation from this threat.

As it stands, member states would be able to hack into journalists’ phones if they suspect their sources could be talking to criminals involved in anything the state perceives to be a threat. The change was led by France, which won backing for an amendment to protect journalists but not “without prejudice to the member states’ responsibility for safeguarding national security”. If the act became law in its current state, British journalists working in the EU would also be at risk of having their phones and computers surveilled.
Last year French intelligence investigators confirmed that Pegasus spyware had been found on the phones of three journalists including a senior member of staff at the TV news station France 24.

The non-profit Forbidden Stories media organisation and Amnesty International said it believed that at least 180 journalists may have been selected as people of interest in advance of possible surveillance by government clients of the Israeli NSO group. NSO has long insisted that the governments to whom it licenses Pegasus are contractually bound to only use the powerful spying tool to fight “serious crime and terrorism”.
Last week, European Digital Rights (EDRi), a network of NGOs and digital rights advocates, called on the European Council to “reconsider” its national security exemptions for spying on the press. “The council is taking dangerous steps towards legalising unacceptable forms of surveillance against journalists and their sources,” said Chloé Berthélémy, senior policy adviser at EDRi.

Link originale: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jun/22/draft-eu-plans-to-allow-spying-on-journalists-are-dangerous-warn-critics

mercoledì 17 maggio 2023

Sorpresi? TikTok, il "cavallo di troia cinese" gestito da funzionari del Dipartimento di Stato USA

TikTok: Chinese “Trojan Horse” Is Run by State Department Officials

Alan Macleod, Mintpressnews, 13 april 2023

Amid a national hysteria claiming the popular video-sharing app is a Chinese Trojan Horse, a MintPress News investigation has found dozens of ex-U.S. State Department officials working in key positions at TikTok. Many more individuals with backgrounds in the FBI, CIA and other departments of the national security state also hold influential posts at the social media giant, affecting the content that over one billion users see.

While American politicians demand the app be banned on national security grounds, try to force through an internet surveillance act that would turn the country into an Orwellian state, make clueless statements about how TikTok is dangerous because it connects to your Wi-Fi, it is possible that TikTok is already much closer to Washington than it is to Beijing.

State Department-affiliated media

For quite some time, TikTok has been recruiting former State Department officials to run its operations. The company’s head of data public policy for Europe, for example, is Jade Nester. Before being recruited for that influential role, Nester was a senior official in Washington, serving for four years as the State Department’s director of Internet public policy.

Mariola Janik, meanwhile, left a long and fruitful career in the government to work for TikTok. Starting out at the Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs, Janik became a career diplomat in the State Department before moving to the Department of Homeland Security. In September, however, she left the government to immediately take up the position of TikTok’s trust and safety program manager, a job that will inevitably include removing content and reshaping algorithms.

While there is no suggestion that Janik is anything other than a model employee, the fact that a U.S. government agent walked into such an influential position at the social media giant should be cause for concern. If, for instance, a high Chinese official was hired to influence what the U.S. public saw in their social media feeds, it would likely be the centerpiece of the TikTok furor currently gripping Washington.

Janik is not the only former security official working on TikTok’s trust and safety team, however. Between 2008 and 2021, Christian Cardona enjoyed a distinguished career at the State Department, serving in Poland, Turkey and Oman, and was in the thick of U.S. interventionism in the Middle East. Between 2012 and 2013, he was an assistant to the U.S. ambassador in Kabul. He later left that role to become the political and military affairs manager for Iran.

In the summer of 2021, he went straight from his top State Department job to become product policy manager for trust and safety at TikTok, a position that, on paper, he appears completely unqualified for. Earlier this year, Cardona left the company.

Another influential individual at TikTok is recruiting coordinator Katrina Villacisneros. Yet before she was choosing whom the company hires, Villacisneros worked at the State Department’s Office of Human Rights and Humanitarian Affairs. And until 2021, she was part of Army Cyber Command, the U.S. military unit that oversees cyberattacks and information warfare online.

Other TikTok employees with long histories in the U.S. national security state include: Brad Earman, global lead of criminal and civil investigations, who spent 21 years as a special agent in the Air Force Office of Special Investigation and also worked as a program manager for antiterrorism at the State Department; and Ryan Walsh, escalations management lead for trust and safety at TikTok, who, until 2020, was the government’s senior advisor for digital strategy. A central part of Walsh’s State Department job, his own résumé notes, was “advanc[ing] supportive narratives” for the U.S. and NATO online.

Walsh, therefore, is illustrative of a broader wave of individuals who have moved from governments attempting to manipulate the global town square to private companies where they are entrusted to keep the public safe from exactly the sort of state-backed influence operations their former colleagues are orchestrating. In short, then, this system, whereby recently retired government officials decide what the world sees (and does not see) online, is one step removed from state censorship on a global level.

For all the talk of digital influence operations emanating from Russia or other U.S. adversaries, the United States is surely the worst offender when it comes to manipulating public opinion online. It is known, for instance, that the Department of Defense employs an army of at least 60,000 people whose job is to influence the public sphere, most of whom serve as “keyboard warriors” and trolls aiming to promote U.S. government or military interests. And earlier this year, the Twitter Files exposed how social media giants collaborated with the Pentagon to help run online influence operations and fake news campaigns aimed at regime change in the Middle East.

Don’t mess with Project Texas

The influx of State Department officials into TikTok’s upper ranks is a consequence of “Project Texas,” an initiative the company began in 2020 in the hopes of avoiding being banned altogether in the United States. During his time in office, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo led the charge to shut the platform down, frequently labeling it a “spying app” and a “propaganda tool for the Chinese Communist Party.”

It was widely reported that the U.S. government had forced the sale of TikTok to Walmart and then Microsoft. But in late 2020, as Project Texas began, those deals mysteriously fell through, and the rhetoric about the dangers of TikTok from officials evaporated.

Project Texas is a $1.5 billion security operation to move the company’s data to Austin. In doing so, it announced that it was partnering with tech giant Oracle, a corporation that, as MintPress has reported on, is the CIA in all but name.

mercoledì 3 maggio 2023

Disinformazione, sofisticazione ed errori dell'Intelligenza artificiale

Misinformation, mistakes and the Pope in a puffer: what rapidly evolving AI can – and can’t – do.

 



Experts have sounded a warning on artificial intelligence as it becomes increasingly sophisticated and harder to detect

 

Donna Lu, The Guardian

Fri 31 Mar 2023 15.00 BST Last modified on Sat 1 Apr 2023 01.05 BST

 

Generative AI – including large language models such as GPT-4, and image generators such as DALL-E, Midjourney, and Stable Diffusion – is advancing in a “storm of hype and fright”, as some commentators have observed.

Recent advances in artificial intelligence have yielded warnings that the rapidly developing technology may result in “ever more powerful digital minds that no one – not even their creators – can understand, predict, or reliably control”.

That’s according to an open letter signed by more than 1,000 AI experts, researchers and backers, which calls for an immediate pause on the creation of “giant” AIs for six months so that safety protocols can be developed to mitigate their dangers.

But what is the technology currently capable of doing?

 

It can generate photorealistic images

Midjourney creates images from text descriptions. It has improved significantly in recent iterations, with version five capable of producing photorealistic images.

These include the faked images of Trump being arrested, which were created by Eliot Higgins, founder of the Bellingcat investigative journalism network.

Midjourney was also used to generate the viral image of Pope Francis in a Balenciaga puffer jacket, which has been described by web culture writer Ryan Broderick as “the first real mass-level AI misinformation case”. (The creator of the image has said he came up with the idea after taking magic mushrooms.)

 

Image generators have raised serious ethical concerns around artistic ownership and copyright, with evidence that some AI programs have being trained on millions of online images without permission or payment, leading to class action lawsuits.

Tools have been developed to protect artistic works from being used by AI, such as Glaze, which uses a cloaking technique that prevents an image generator from accurately being able to replicate the style in an artwork.

It can convincingly replicate people’s voices

AI-generated voices can be trained to sound like specific people, with enough accuracy that it fooled a voice identification system used by the Australian government, a Guardian Australia investigation revealed.

 

It can convincingly replicate people’s voices

In Latin America, voice actors have reported losing work because they have been replaced by AI dubbing software. “An increasingly popular option for voice actors is to take up poorly paid recording gigs at AI voiceover companies, training the very technology that aims to supplant them,” a Rest of World report found.

It can write

GPT-4, the most powerful model released by OpenAI, can code in every computer programming language and write essays and books. Large language models have led to a boom in AI-written ebooks for sale on Amazon. Some media outlets, such as CNET, have reportedly used AI to write articles.

 

Video AI is getting a lot better

There are now text-to-video generators available, which, as their name suggests, can turn a text description into a moving image.

 

It can turn 2D images into 3D

AI is also getting better at turning 2D still images into 3D visualizations.

 

It makes factual errors and hallucinates

AI, particularly large language models that are used for chatbots such as ChatGPT, is notorious for making factual mistakes that are easily missed because they seem reasonably convincing.

For every example of a functional use for AI chatbots, there is seemingly a counter-example of its failure.

Prof Ethan Mollick at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, for example, tested GPT-4 and was able to provide a fair peer review of a research paper as if it were an economic sociologist.

However, Robin Bauwens, an assistant professor at Tilburg University in the Netherlands, had an academic paper rejected by a reviewer, who had likely used AI as the reviewer suggested he familiarise himself with academic papers that had been made up.

The question of why AI generates fake academic papers relates to how large language models work: they are probabilistic, in that they map the probability over sequences of words. As Dr David Smerdon of the University of Queensland puts it: “Given the start of a sentence, it will try to guess the most likely words to come next.”

In February, Bing launched a pre-recorded demo of its AI. As the software engineer Dmitri Brereton has pointed out, the AI was asked to generate a five-day itinerary for Mexico City. Of five descriptions of suggested nightlife options, four were inaccurate, Brereton found. In summarising the figures from a financial report, Brereton found, it also managed to fudge the numbers badly.

 

It can create (cursed) instructions and recipes

ChatGPT has been used to write crochet patterns, resulting in hilariously cursed results.

GPT-4, the latest iteration of the AI behind the chatbot, can also provide recipe suggestions based on a photograph of the contents of your fridge. I tried this with several images from the Fridge Detective subreddit, but not once did it return any recipe suggestions containing ingredients that were actually in the fridge pictures.

 

It can act as an assistant to do administrative tasks

“Advances in AI will enable the creation of a personal agent,” Bill Gates wrote this week. “Think of it as a digital personal assistant: It will see your latest emails, know about the meetings you attend, read what you read, and read the things you don’t want to bother with.”

“This will both improve your work on the tasks you want to do and free you from the ones you don’t want to do.”

For years, Google Assistant’s AI has been able to make reservations at restaurants via phone calls.

OpenAI has now enabled plugins for GPT-4, enabling it to look up data on the web and to order groceries.


Link originale: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/apr/01/misinformation-mistakes-and-the-pope-in-a-puffer-what-rapidly-evolving-ai-can-and-cant-do