"In Europa ci sono già i presupposti per l'esplosione di un conflitto sociale. Questo è il seme del malcontento, dell'egoismo e della disperazione che la classe politica e la classe dirigente hanno sparso. Questo è terreno fertile per la xenofobia, la violenza, il terrorismo interno, il successo del populismo e dell'estremismo politico."

giovedì 27 gennaio 2022

Giornata della Memoria: il contesto sociale e culturale in cui l'Olocausto si è sviluppato

Oggi 27 gennaio si celebra la Giornata della Memoria".


La data coincide con la liberazione del campo di concentramento nei pressi della città polacca di Oświęcim (in tedesco Auschwitz).


Poco si parla invece delle Norme sulla difesa della razza italiana, una serie di decreti promulgati a partire dall'estate e autunno del 1938, poi convertiti in legge.

In questi giorni si è spesso solo citato, quasi ritualmente, il termine "Leggi Razziali", ma nessuno nel nostro paese le sviscera articolo per articolo, le legge pubblicamente, le insegna nelle Università, le studia a scuola, ne rende obbligatoria la conoscenza in alcun programma di studio.


Ancora nel 2022 in Italia - a differenza che in Germania - sembra si faccia fatica a riconoscere e ad elaborare questa pagina della nostra storia e della storia del nostro Diritto.

Qual'era il substrato sociale e culturale in cui l'Olocausto ha potuto attecchire?

Qui sotto il testo integrale della voce "Razzismo" dell'Grande Dizionario Enciclopedico UTET del 1939, quando tutto cominciò:





lunedì 24 gennaio 2022

Polizia tedesca utilizza "Pegasus" di NSO contro il parere di avvocati ed esperti, e senza fornire dati sul suo utilizzo.

German police secretly bought NSO Pegasus spyware

Sources have confirmed media reports that federal criminal police purchased and used the controversial Israeli surveillance spyware despite lawyers' objections.


    

NSO makes Pegasus spyware favored by governments and intelligence agencies worldwide


Deutsche Welle - 07.09.2021


The German Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA) bought notorious Pegasus spyware from the Israeli firm NSO in 2019, it was revealed Tuesday.

The federal government informed the Interior Committee of the Bundestag of the purchase in a closed-doors session, parliament sources said. That confirmed earlier reports published in German newspaper Die Zeit.

The software was procured under "the utmost secrecy," according to Die Zeit, despite the hesitations of lawyers as the surveillance tool can do much more than German privacy laws permit.

However, the version purchased by the BKA had certain functions blocked to prevent abuse, security circles told the paper ­— although it is unclear how that works on a practical level.

The revelations were a result of joint research by Die Zeit as well as daily Süddeutsche Zeitung and public broadcasters NDR and WDR.


What has the German government said?

According to the Süddeutsche Zeitung, BKA Vice President Martina Link confirmed to lawmakers that her organization had purchased the software. In late 2020, the BKA acquired a version of the Pegasus Trojan virus software. It has been used in select operations concerning terrorism and organized crime since March of this year.

Germany's Federal Constitutional Court has ruled that security services are only permitted to use spyware on the cellphones and computers of surveillance targets in special cases, and can only initiate certain types of operations.

While the rule of law has placed limits, the technology available has grown seemingly limitless.


The German government has been asked specifically about the use of NSO spyware three times in recent years and has largely refused to account for its use or subject itself to scrutiny for it.

In a written statement to an official inquiry, Left Party lawmaker Martina Renner was told the parliament's right to information conflicted with the "confidentiality interests justified by the welfare of the state in exceptional cases."


Why are NSO and Pegasus controversial?

NSO sells the Pegasus surveillance tool to police and intelligence agencies globally. The tool itself is powerful enough that it can spy on iPhones and Android smartphones in real time, enable the microphone and video functions to record conversations and settings, read location data and bypass encryption on chat messages.

The BKA began its negotiations with NSO in 2017. For years, the BKA had made use of its own in-house surveillance software, but it became cumbersome and outdated, which is why authorities turned to NSO.

Among the targets of NSO Pegasus software: Emmanuel Macron

Pegasus makes use of vulnerabilities in the security of smartphones to open a privacy-violating Pandora's box of surveillance tools. More troubling yet is who has been targeted by governments around the world that have purchased the tool.

In July, a consortium of news organizations including Die Zeit reported on the extensive abuses of the technology drawn from a list of potential targets in 2016 that included more than 50,000 phone numbers.

Among the targets were human rights activists, journalists and lawyers as well as a dozen heads of state and several government ministers and senior diplomats.

Technical analysis of the cellphones of several of these individuals revealed the phones had been successfully hacked using Pegasus software.


How has Germany reacted?

Green Party member of parliament Konstantin von Notz called it a "nightmare for the rule of law." He demanding "full clarification" from the federal government as to who "specifically bears responsibility for the purchase and use of the spy software."

Frank Überall, the chairman of the German Journalists' Association, said the union wanted to know "whether journalists were spied on without their knowledge, whether their sources are still safe."

Überall called the BKA's action "incomprehensible" and added Interior Minister Horst Seehofer should "lay his cards on the table."

ar/rt (AFP, epd)



Link originale: https://www.dw.com/en/german-police-secretly-bought-nso-pegasus-spyware/a-59113197

giovedì 20 gennaio 2022

QED: servizi segreti che orchestrano attentati e compromettono politici e uomini d'affari per ricattarli, dove trovarli

2017 terror attacks orchestrated by Spain's secret service, says former police official


José Manuel Villarejo claims aim was to destabilize Catalonia before independence push, sparking outrage

CatalanNews - 11 January 2022 07:33 PM byACN | Barcelona


A former high-ranking police official, José Manuel Villarejo, has said that he believes the 2017 terror attacks in Barcelona and Cambrils were orchestrated by Spain's secret service.

Talking before Spain's National Court on Tuesday, he said the aim was to destabilize Catalonia before the independence referendum, but the outcome, 16 deaths, was a miscalculation.

According to him, the August 17, 2017 incidents, including a truck running over passers-by on the Catalan capital's La Rambla, "were a serious mistake" on the part of Spain's former National Intelligence Center (CNI) director, Féliz Sanz Roldán.

The CNI head "wanted to give Catalonia a fright" ahead of the October 1, 2017 referendum, but "miscalculated the consequences."

Villarejo has been in the spotlight for years, being famous in Spain for some secret operations he has taken part in along with CNI – indeed on Tuesday he admitted contributing to "try to fix the mess" that the attacks caused to the secret services. Shortly after the events, it was revealed that its alleged mastermind, Ripoll's imam, had been an informant of CNI.

The former high-ranking official spent over three years in provisional jail and he still has to face several trials for some of the operations he discreetly executed. 

Calls for an investigation

His comments on Tuesday have sparked outrage among part of the Catalan political parties, especially those in favor of independence. 

For years, they have urged Spain to run an investigation on the links between its intelligence and Abdelbaki Es Satty. After Villarejo's comments on Tuesday, the current Catalan president, Pere Aragonès, demanded Madrid to look into it again and requested his government's legal team to review the former police officer's remarks. 

"If his words are true, we need an explanation now," said Aragonès. 

Parliament speaker Laura Borràs also requested for the chamber's legal team to take the case to the public prosecutor. 

Carles Puigdemont, who was Catalan president in 2017, said that Spain should be accountable for the attacks "for its rejection to investigate" the alleged links between Es Satty and Villarejo.

Seven parties in Spain's Congress will request for a parliamentary committee on the issue to be launched. 

Villarejo was ordered to discredit Catalan pro-independence politicians

Villarejo has become a famous character in the past few years after he leaked a number of recordings of private conversations he had with important figures, such as former King Juan Carlos' lover Corinna zu Sayn-Wittgenstein. After some of these leaks, the prosecutor in Switzerland began an investigation against the former monarch for allegedly having received $100 million from Saudi Arabia in 2008. 

Especially after being accused of several crimes related to his discreet operations and being imprisoned, the former inspector has revealed the content of such conversations and some of his activities, involving the Spanish state in operations such as trying to discredit Catalan pro-independence politicians.

In 2018, some recordings leaked by the media outlet moncloa.com revealed that Villarejo explained to the then prosecutor Dolores Delgado that he had created a prostitution network in order to get information from politicians and businesspeople.




Link originale: https://www.catalannews.com/politics/item/2017-terror-attacks-orchestrated-by-spain-s-secret-service-says-former-police-official 

mercoledì 15 dicembre 2021

Un'immagine del futuro? L'auto elettrica che raccoglie dati facciali degli automobilisti a loro insaputa.

Xpeng Motors fined by Chinese watchdog for facial recognition breach

 

 

TechNode, by Jill Shen Dec 15, 2021 

 

Chinese electric vehicle maker Xpeng has been ordered to pay RMB 100,000 ($15,710) in fines by China’s local market watchdog for collecting customers’ facial data without consent, Chinese media reported, as Beijing looks to tighten rules over user data privacy.

Why it matters: The latest penalty reflects the Chinese authorities’ goal of tightening data privacy rules following a series of controversies over the use of consumers’ personal data. The moves are changing the way Chinese tech companies operate.

 

"German automaker BMW was also found

using facial recognition technology on customers

without their knowledge"

 

Details: A district office under Shanghai’s market regulator (Shanghai Municipal Administration for Market Regulation) has imposed a fine of RMB 100,000 on an Xpeng subsidiary for unlawfully gathering facial data without customers’ knowledge, state-owned media The Paper reported Tuesday, citing Tianyancha, a Chinese business data inquiry platform.

  • The Alibaba-backed EV maker was handed the fine for installing a total of 22 facial-recognition cameras in seven showrooms in Shanghai, according to a penalty bill (in Chinese) viewed by state-owned media outlet China News Service.
  • The company reportedly used these cameras to collect more than 430,000 facial images during the first six months of this year without declaring the practice to the public, thus breaching China’s consumer protection law, the report said, citing the market watchdog.
  • Xpeng said in a Tuesday statement to local media that it used the technology to gather information such as traffic flows, hoping to improve sales and better customer service. The company added that it had deleted all collected facial data and will strictly comply with regulations and protect customers’ personal information in the future.

 

Context: Xpeng is not the first automaker in China to violate customers’ privacy. German automaker BMW was found using facial recognition technology on customers without their knowledge, state broadcaster CCTV reported in March. 

  • The Chinese government in August passed the Personal Information Protection Law, which came into effect on Nov. 1. The law requires companies to gain consent before collecting personal data. 
 
 

Link originale: https://technode.com/2021/12/15/xpeng-motors-fined-by-chinese-watchdog-for-facial-recognition-breach/

martedì 7 dicembre 2021

L'involuzione digitale dell'Umanità: l'epoca della solitudine (sorvegliata)

Da homo sapiens a homo digitalis: l’involuzione umana nella società digitale moderna

 

 


 

Ettore Guarnaccia, ettoreguarnaccia.com, 12 Novembre 2021

 

L’evoluzione digitale, iniziata con le migliori intenzioni, ha portato all’avvento e allo sviluppo di social media e dispositivi digitali. Questo ha modificato profondamente la società, i nostri comportamenti e le nostre attitudini, causando di fatto un’involuzione dell’essere umano facilmente osservabile e molto preoccupante. Mentre non è difficile immaginare quale sarà il risultato futuro di questa involuzione, se non si agisce tempestivamente sarà invece sempre più difficile cambiare rotta e dirigersi verso una reale evoluzione dell’essere umano.

 

"Okay Houston, we’ve had a problem here!"

 

 La frase pronunciata il 13 aprile 1970 da John Leonard “Jack” Swigert Jr., pilota del modulo di comando della missione Apollo 13, subito dopo l’esplosione e il danneggiamento di due serbatoi di ossigeno, col senno di poi, sarebbe stata perfetta se pronunciata anche nel 2002, quando fu lanciato il primo social network Friendster, oppure nel 2003, quando MySpace divenne famoso e utilizzato a livello mondiale, il 4 febbraio 2004, quando fu lanciato Facebook, o ancora il 9 gennaio 2007, quando fu presentato al mondo l’Apple iPhone, il primo esemplare di smartphone che introdusse contestualmente anche il concetto di “app”.

Avvenimenti che, nell’arco di soli 5 anni, hanno condotto la società nell’era digitale cambiandola profondamente, portando moltissimi vantaggi in termini di comunicazione, ubiquità della connessione a Internet e al Web, relazione a distanza, scambio di informazioni, innumerevoli servizi, applicazioni e giochi sempre a portata di mano. In pochissimo tempo, lo smartphone è diventato un’estensione del nostro corpo, onnipresente nella nostra quotidianità, contornato da altri oggetti digitali connessi, auricolari, smartwatch, sistema di entertainment dell’automobile e molto altro. Oggi diamo tutto questo per scontato, eppure solo 15 anni fa non avremmo mai lontanamente immaginato un’evoluzione tecnologica così rapida e pervasiva.

 

Tutto è avvenuto in maniera inizialmente graduale, ma con una progressione in costante accelerazione che ancora oggi sta procedendo a ritmi sempre più rapidi e inarrestabili. Basti pensare all’introduzione del 5G, delle reti satellitari, di smartphone sempre più funzionali e potenti, e dei tantissimi oggetti di uso comune (televisori, stereo, telecamere, frigoriferi, lavastoviglie, friggitrici, ecc.) connessi a Internet e allo smartphone. Tutto è connesso, tutto è digitale, tutto è “smart”.

Ma quello che inizialmente sembrava così utile, strabiliante e stupefacente, in realtà ha comportato un elevato prezzo da pagare, e non mi riferisco ai soldi.

Moltissime funzionalità introdotte da social e smartphone sono state create con intenti positivi, per aumentare la soddisfazione, e di conseguenza l’interazione degli utenti, pur sempre con l’obiettivo unico e imprescindibile di fare business. Ci viene costantemente raccontato dalla pubblicità che le evoluzioni tecnologiche servono per migliorare la nostra vita e metterci a disposizione nuovi strumenti mirabolanti ed efficienti: in parte è accidentalmente vero, ma la realtà è sempre e solo una: dietro tutto questo, il fine unico e imprescindibile è il profitto, cui si arriva anche attraverso la raccolta dei dati e il controllo dei comportamenti degli utenti. Lo hanno pubblicamente denunciato diversi esponenti e sviluppatori delle big tech di Silicon Valley.

Così, con le migliori intenzioni, sono nati il “like” di Facebook, la riproduzione automatica di YouTube, le notifiche di Apple, il “pull-to-refresh” di Twitter, i cuoricini di Instagram, le “loot box” dei videogiochi e tante altre funzionalità che hanno contribuito ad aumentare sensibilmente l’interazione e, quindi, lo screen-time degli utenti. Funzionalità che sono state largamente adottate dai produttori, spesso in combinazione tra loro, come è accaduto con gamblification e gamification, che hanno portato rispettivamente l’azzardo all’interno di videogiochi, social e app, e la parvenza di videogiochi all’interno del mondo dell’azzardo e delle app. Giochi di abilità per acquisire punteggi e oggetti di vario genere, sorteggi o estrazioni di premi, quiz e sondaggi, sono oggi presenti in moltissime app bancarie, assicurative, di e-commerce o della grande distribuzione. Queste funzionalità si sono dimostrate maledettamente efficaci nel fidelizzare i clienti e favorire il business.

 

Da qualche anno a questa parte – cioè da quando i produttori di piattaforme social e app hanno compreso le potenzialità degli effetti di determinate funzionalità digitali sui meccanismi neurologici degli utenti – dispositivi, app e social media sono stati appositamente disegnati e sviluppati per catturare l’attenzione degli utenti, fidelizzarli e mantenerli il più possibile incollati al display. Già oggi per molte persone, soprattutto per bambini e adolescenti, lo smartphone è l’ultima cosa con cui si interagisce prima di dormire e la prima al risveglio. Le sollecitazioni sono numerose e frequenti, non passa un minuto senza che riceviamo una notifica, un messaggio, un “din!” che dirotta la nostra attenzione e il nostro sguardo sul dispositivo digitale. Queste tecnologie hanno preso in ostaggio la mente e la volontà degli utenti, dominandone il pensiero, interrompendone ripetutamente azioni e intenzioni, generando una lenta e inavvertibile assuefazione, attraverso stimolazioni ripetute a brevissima distanza l’una dall’altra o con iperstimolazioni derivanti da più stimoli concomitanti (es. smartphone, tablet, console di gioco e televisione utilizzati nello stesso momento).

In questo processo, etica, principi, ragionevoli cautele e buon senso sono stati sacrificati sull’altare del business, del profitto e della rapidità di evoluzione tecnologica, e molti processi neurologici che inducono assuefazione e dipendenza sono stati sfruttati il più possibile, senza scrupoli e senza informarne gli utenti. Anzi, questo sfruttamento è avvenuto, e avviene tuttora, senza che venga in alcun modo bilanciato da un’adeguata preparazione degli utenti, in forma di educazione digitale, conoscenza informatica, coscienza dei meccanismi neurologici e consapevolezza degli effetti che tutto ciò ha sulla mente, sulle scelte personali e sui comportamenti. Chi ha visto il film-documentario “The Social Dilemma” capirà un po’ meglio quanto affermo, ma c’è molto di più dietro le quinte.

 

Il meccanismo neurologico più sfruttato è quello della ricompensa variabile, spesso nell’ambito di un preciso processo di aggancio (“hook”) come descritto dall’esperto di psicologia del consumatore Nir Eyal nel suo libro “Hooked”. Il processo è: [trigger + azione + ricompensa variabile + investimento]. Il trigger è l’innesco che attiva il comportamento (es. la notifica di una nuova e-mail, un messaggio, un like, un nuovo follower, ecc.), l’azione è il comportamento che adotta l’utente nella speranza di una ricompensa (es. aprire l’e-mail, visualizzare il messaggio, scorrere la timeline di un social media, ecc.) che deve però essere variabile, nel senso che se l’utente non sa cosa aspettarsi (es. la notifica può riguardare un messaggio positivo molto atteso, una delusione o qualcosa che gli è indifferente) l’effetto assuefacente risulta estremamente più potente. Infine, l’investimento, sotto forma di tempo impiegato nel perpetrare il comportamento, di soldi spesi per proseguire, di impegno profuso nella raccolta (di like, commenti, follower, ecc.), nella costruzione di contenuti (es. Instagram, TikTok e YouTube) o nel partecipare a community tematiche, tutte cose che aumentano la fidelizzazione e spingono alla reiterazione del comportamento.

È l’attesa di una ricompensa variabile a generare veri e propri boom di dopamina in specifiche aree del cervello, le stesse interessate dalle varie forme di dipendenza comportamentale o da sostanze, che vengono così rafforzate dall’azione di questo neurotrasmettitore che attiva le sinapsi che collegano i neuroni. La chiave è proprio l’attesa, per questo slot machine, lotterie, roulette, sorteggi, estrazioni, l’apertura di bauli, lo scrolling di Instagram o TikTok, la visualizzazione in sequenza di video su YouTube o di episodi di serie TV su Netflix e Prime Video, o anche il semplice refresh della videata di un’app, risultano così attraenti e diabolicamente assuefacenti. Inoltre, il rafforzamento delle aree cerebrali legate alla dipendenza, soprattutto se sollecitate da ricompense di tipo artificiale, predispone ad abbracciare ulteriori forme di dipendenza in futuro.

venerdì 26 novembre 2021

I retroscena sul caso TIM-KKR: Prysmiangroup, la fibra ottica e l'arsenale di armi informatiche della CIA

"Vault 7": CIA Hacking Tools Revealed

 



Press Release

 

Today, Tuesday 7 March 2017, WikiLeaks begins its new series of leaks on the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency. Code-named "Vault 7" by WikiLeaks, it is the largest ever publication of confidential documents on the agency.

The first full part of the series, "Year Zero", comprises 8,761 documents and files from an isolated, high-security network situated inside the CIA's Center for Cyber Intelligence in Langley, Virgina. It follows an introductory disclosure last month of CIA targeting French political parties and candidates in the lead up to the 2012 presidential election.

Recently, the CIA lost control of the majority of its hacking arsenal including malware, viruses, trojans, weaponized "zero day" exploits, malware remote control systems and associated documentation. This extraordinary collection, which amounts to more than several hundred million lines of code, gives its possessor the entire hacking capacity of the CIA. The archive appears to have been circulated among former U.S. government hackers and contractors in an unauthorized manner, one of whom has provided WikiLeaks with portions of the archive.

 

"Year Zero" introduces the scope and direction of the CIA's global covert hacking program, its malware arsenal and dozens of "zero day" weaponized exploits against a wide range of U.S. and European company products, include Apple's iPhone, Google's Android and Microsoft's Windows and even Samsung TVs, which are turned into covert microphones.

Since 2001 the CIA has gained political and budgetary preeminence over the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA). The CIA found itself building not just its now infamous drone fleet, but a very different type of covert, globe-spanning force — its own substantial fleet of hackers. The agency's hacking division freed it from having to disclose its often controversial operations to the NSA (its primary bureaucratic rival) in order to draw on the NSA's hacking capacities.

 

By the end of 2016, the CIA's hacking division, which formally falls under the agency's Center for Cyber Intelligence (CCI), had over 5000 registered users and had produced more than a thousand hacking systems, trojans, viruses, and other "weaponized" malware. Such is the scale of the CIA's undertaking that by 2016, its hackers had utilized more code than that used to run Facebook. The CIA had created, in effect, its "own NSA" with even less accountability and without publicly answering the question as to whether such a massive budgetary spend on duplicating the capacities of a rival agency could be justified.

In a statement to WikiLeaks the source details policy questions that they say urgently need to be debated in public, including whether the CIA's hacking capabilities exceed its mandated powers and the problem of public oversight of the agency. The source wishes to initiate a public debate about the security, creation, use, proliferation and democratic control of cyberweapons.

Once a single cyber 'weapon' is 'loose' it can spread around the world in seconds, to be used by rival states, cyber mafia and teenage hackers alike.

 

Julian Assange, WikiLeaks editor stated that "There is an extreme proliferation risk in the development of cyber 'weapons'. Comparisons can be drawn between the uncontrolled proliferation of such 'weapons', which results from the inability to contain them combined with their high market value, and the global arms trade. But the significance of "Year Zero" goes well beyond the choice between cyberwar and cyberpeace. The disclosure is also exceptional from a political, legal and forensic perspective."

Wikileaks has carefully reviewed the "Year Zero" disclosure and published substantive CIA documentation while avoiding the distribution of 'armed' cyberweapons until a consensus emerges on the technical and political nature of the CIA's program and how such 'weapons' should analyzed, disarmed and published.

Wikileaks has also decided to redact and anonymise some identifying information in "Year Zero" for in depth analysis. These redactions include ten of thousands of CIA targets and attack machines throughout Latin America, Europe and the United States. While we are aware of the imperfect results of any approach chosen, we remain committed to our publishing model and note that the quantity of published pages in "Vault 7" part one (“Year Zero”) already eclipses the total number of pages published over the first three years of the Edward Snowden NSA leaks.

 

Analysis

 

CIA malware targets iPhone, Android, smart TVs

CIA malware and hacking tools are built by EDG (Engineering Development Group), a software development group within CCI (Center for Cyber Intelligence), a department belonging to the CIA's DDI (Directorate for Digital Innovation). The DDI is one of the five major directorates of the CIA (see this organizational chart of the CIA for more details).

The EDG is responsible for the development, testing and operational support of all backdoors, exploits, malicious payloads, trojans, viruses and any other kind of malware used by the CIA in its covert operations world-wide.

The increasing sophistication of surveillance techniques has drawn comparisons with George Orwell's 1984, but "Weeping Angel", developed by the CIA's Embedded Devices Branch (EDB), which infests smart TVs, transforming them into covert microphones, is surely its most emblematic realization.

The attack against Samsung smart TVs was developed in cooperation with the United Kingdom's MI5/BTSS. After infestation, Weeping Angel places the target TV in a 'Fake-Off' mode, so that the owner falsely believes the TV is off when it is on. In 'Fake-Off' mode the TV operates as a bug, recording conversations in the room and sending them over the Internet to a covert CIA server. 

As of October 2014 the CIA was also looking at infecting the vehicle control systems used by modern cars and trucks. The purpose of such control is not specified, but it would permit the CIA to engage in nearly undetectable assassinations.

 

The CIA's Mobile Devices Branch (MDB) developed numerous attacks to remotely hack and control popular smart phones. Infected phones can be instructed to send the CIA the user's geolocation, audio and text communications as well as covertly activate the phone's camera and microphone.

Despite iPhone's minority share (14.5%) of the global smart phone market in 2016, a specialized unit in the CIA's Mobile Development Branch produces malware to infest, control and exfiltrate data from iPhones and other Apple products running iOS, such as iPads. CIA's arsenal includes numerous local and remote "zero days" developed by CIA or obtained from GCHQ, NSA, FBI or purchased from cyber arms contractors such as Baitshop. The disproportionate focus on iOS may be explained by the popularity of the iPhone among social, political, diplomatic and business elites.

A similar unit targets Google's Android which is used to run the majority of the world's smart phones (~85%) including Samsung, HTC and Sony. 1.15 billion Android powered phones were sold last year. "Year Zero" shows that as of 2016 the CIA had 24 "weaponized" Android "zero days" which it has developed itself and obtained from GCHQ, NSA and cyber arms contractors.

These techniques permit the CIA to bypass the encryption of WhatsApp, Signal, Telegram, Wiebo, Confide and Cloackman by hacking the "smart" phones that they run on and collecting audio and message traffic before encryption is applied.

 

CIA malware targets Windows, OSx, Linux, routers

The CIA also runs a very substantial effort to infect and control Microsoft Windows users with its malware. This includes multiple local and remote weaponized "zero days", air gap jumping viruses such as "Hammer Drill" which infects software distributed on CD/DVDs, infectors for removable media such as USBs, systems to hide data in images or in covert disk areas ( "Brutal Kangaroo") and to keep its malware infestations going.

Many of these infection efforts are pulled together by the CIA's Automated Implant Branch (AIB), which has developed several attack systems for automated infestation and control of CIA malware, such as "Assassin" and "Medusa".

Attacks against Internet infrastructure and webservers are developed by the CIA's Network Devices Branch (NDB).

The CIA has developed automated multi-platform malware attack and control systems covering Windows, Mac OS X, Solaris, Linux and more, such as EDB's "HIVE" and the related "Cutthroat" and "Swindle" tools, which are described in the examples section below.

 

CIA 'hoarded' vulnerabilities ("zero days")

In the wake of Edward Snowden's leaks about the NSA, the U.S. technology industry secured a commitment from the Obama administration that the executive would disclose on an ongoing basis — rather than hoard — serious vulnerabilities, exploits, bugs or "zero days" to Apple, Google, Microsoft, and other US-based manufacturers.

Serious vulnerabilities not disclosed to the manufacturers places huge swathes of the population and critical infrastructure at risk to foreign intelligence or cyber criminals who independently discover or hear rumors of the vulnerability. If the CIA can discover such vulnerabilities so can others.

The U.S. government's commitment to the Vulnerabilities Equities Process came after significant lobbying by US technology companies, who risk losing their share of the global market over real and perceived hidden vulnerabilities. The government stated that it would disclose all pervasive vulnerabilities discovered after 2010 on an ongoing basis.

"Year Zero" documents show that the CIA breached the Obama administration's commitments. Many of the vulnerabilities used in the CIA's cyber arsenal are pervasive and some may already have been found by rival intelligence agencies or cyber criminals.

As an example, specific CIA malware revealed in "Year Zero" is able to penetrate, infest and control both the Android phone and iPhone software that runs or has run presidential Twitter accounts. The CIA attacks this software by using undisclosed security vulnerabilities ("zero days") possessed by the CIA but if the CIA can hack these phones then so can everyone else who has obtained or discovered the vulnerability. As long as the CIA keeps these vulnerabilities concealed from Apple and Google (who make the phones) they will not be fixed, and the phones will remain hackable.

The same vulnerabilities exist for the population at large, including the U.S. Cabinet, Congress, top CEOs, system administrators, security officers and engineers. By hiding these security flaws from manufacturers like Apple and Google the CIA ensures that it can hack everyone &mdsh; at the expense of leaving everyone hackable.

lunedì 22 novembre 2021

Una videorecensione di "UROPIA il protocollo Maynards" del Professore-Youtuber Simone Bulleri

Simone Bulleri (YouTube) Videorecensione di UROPIA- il protocollo Maynards

di Pietro Bargagli Stoffi, thriller distopico (edizioni Bibliotheka, 2019)





Postiamo volentieri una approfondita e sofisticata videorecensione dello youtuber Simone Bulleri, pubblicata dal Professore toscano sul suo gradevole canale dove conversa di storia, filosofia, letteratura e cinema con competenza e piacevolezza, condividendo spesso con i followers le sue doti attoriali coltivate in anni e anni di teatro.

Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yoex26KBIv0&t=14s